Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223)
Access The Exact Questions for Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223)
💯 100% Pass Rate guaranteed
🗓️ Unlock for 1 Month
Rated 4.8/5 from over 1000+ reviews
- Unlimited Exact Practice Test Questions
- Trusted By 200 Million Students and Professors
What’s Included:
- Unlock 0 + Actual Exam Questions and Answers for Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223) on monthly basis
- Well-structured questions covering all topics, accompanied by organized images.
- Learn from mistakes with detailed answer explanations.
- Easy To understand explanations for all students.
Your All-Access Prep Bundle: Unlocked Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223) : Practice Questions & Answers
Free Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223) Questions
Which of the following "outside firms" are hired to administer self-insured plans?
-
Secondary administrators
-
Reinsurers
-
Third party administrators
-
Secondary insurers
Explanation
Correct Answer
C. Third party administrators
Explanation
Third-party administrators (TPAs) are commonly hired by self-insured companies to manage the claims process, enrollment, and other administrative functions of self-insured health plans. These firms handle day-to-day operations on behalf of the self-insured entity, ensuring that claims are processed and paid correctly.
Why other options are wrong
A. Secondary administrators
Secondary administrators do not typically refer to firms that manage self-insured health plans. This term is not commonly used in the context of insurance administration.
B. Reinsurers
Reinsurers are companies that provide insurance to insurance companies, allowing them to manage risk. They do not administer self-insured plans, but rather provide financial protection against large losses.
D. Secondary insurers
Secondary insurers are not typically involved in the administration of self-insured plans. Secondary insurance refers to a policy that covers additional costs after the primary insurance has been paid, and they are not responsible for plan administration.
Studies have shown that physicians compensated on an incentive-based system:
-
Provide less quantities of care and/or see less patients
-
Provide lower quality care
-
Provide more quantities of care and/or see more patients
-
Provide no difference in quantities of care and/or number of patients
Explanation
Correct Answer
C. Provide more quantities of care and/or see more patients
Explanation
Studies have indicated that physicians compensated under an incentive-based system tend to provide more care and see more patients. This system is designed to reward physicians for meeting certain performance targets, such as the number of patients seen or services provided, which can lead to an increase in patient volume and care quantity. However, this can sometimes result in concerns about quality of care due to the focus on quantity.
Why other options are wrong
A. Provide less quantities of care and/or see less patients
This is incorrect because incentive-based compensation tends to drive physicians to see more patients and provide more services in order to meet the targets set for their compensation, rather than providing fewer services.
B. Provide lower quality care
This is incorrect because while incentive-based systems may encourage physicians to see more patients, it doesn't inherently mean the quality of care decreases. However, there can be concerns that a focus on quantity might indirectly affect the quality of care, but the statement itself is not universally true.
D. Provide no difference in quantities of care and/or number of patients
This is incorrect because studies suggest that there is a noticeable difference in the number of patients seen and the quantity of care provided under incentive-based systems, as physicians may be motivated to meet performance goals.
Why might one argue AGAINST paying a physician a salary instead of fee-for-service payments?
-
Salaries still encourage providers to recommend unnecessary tests and procedures.
-
Salaries discourage providers from considering the costs of the treatments they recommend.
-
Salaries provide less relative financial stability.
-
Salaries offer less 'wiggle room' and do not necessarily compensate providers for working extra hours/shifts.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D. Salaries offer less 'wiggle room' and do not necessarily compensate providers for working extra hours/shifts.
Explanation
One argument against paying physicians a salary instead of fee-for-service is that salaried arrangements often do not compensate providers for extra hours or shifts worked. With fee-for-service, physicians are incentivized to see more patients or perform additional services to increase their earnings. Salaries may offer financial stability but lack this incentive, which can lead to dissatisfaction for physicians who work beyond standard hours.
Why other options are wrong
A. Salaries still encourage providers to recommend unnecessary tests and procedures.
This is a concern associated with fee-for-service models, not salaried models. In fee-for-service, providers are paid based on the volume of services rendered, which might lead to unnecessary tests. However, salaried physicians are typically less incentivized by volume-based payments.
B. Salaries discourage providers from considering the costs of the treatments they recommend.
Salaries do not inherently discourage providers from considering costs. In fact, salaried arrangements can encourage more thoughtful and cost-effective decision-making, as physicians are not directly compensated for more treatments or tests.
C. Salaries provide less relative financial stability.
Salaries generally offer more financial stability than fee-for-service arrangements, as physicians receive consistent pay, irrespective of the number of patients they see. This option is incorrect because salaried positions are typically viewed as providing greater stability.
How are governmental healthcare organizations primarily funded?
-
Through insurance premiums collected from patients
-
By charging high fees for services rendered
-
Through private donations and fundraising events
-
Through tax revenues and government funding
Explanation
Correct Answer
D. Through tax revenues and government funding
Explanation
Governmental healthcare organizations are funded primarily through public tax revenues and government funding. These organizations are usually operated by the government at local, state, or federal levels and are financed by taxpayer money, which supports their services to the public. This method ensures that healthcare services remain accessible to all, regardless of individuals' ability to pay.
Why other options are wrong
A. Through insurance premiums collected from patients
This option is incorrect because governmental healthcare organizations typically do not rely on insurance premiums paid by patients for their funding. Instead, they are funded through taxes and government allocations. Insurance premiums are generally associated with private healthcare systems or specific programs like Medicaid or Medicare, not the primary funding mechanism for government-run health services.
B. By charging high fees for services rendered
This is incorrect because governmental healthcare organizations are designed to provide affordable care to the public, which typically includes services subsidized by tax dollars. Charging high fees would contradict the purpose of these organizations, which aim to ensure healthcare accessibility for everyone, including lower-income individuals.
C. Through private donations and fundraising events
While some governmental healthcare organizations may accept private donations, this is not their primary funding source. Donations and fundraising events may supplement government funding but cannot sustain the operational costs of such organizations. The bulk of the funding comes from tax revenues and government grants, not private contributions.
What was a significant consequence of the scrutiny surrounding utilization controls in healthcare?
-
Increased funding for preventive care programs
-
Heightened demands for evidence supporting the effectiveness of utilization controls
-
Reduction in the number of healthcare providers
-
Expansion of fee-for-service models
Explanation
Correct Answer
B. Heightened demands for evidence supporting the effectiveness of utilization controls
Explanation
The scrutiny surrounding utilization controls led to a greater focus on evaluating the effectiveness of these controls in managing costs while maintaining quality of care. Stakeholders, including policymakers and insurers, demanded evidence that utilization controls actually improved care quality or reduced unnecessary treatments, leading to more research and data-driven approaches to healthcare management.
Why other options are wrong
A. Increased funding for preventive care programs
While preventive care is important in healthcare, increased funding for such programs was not a direct consequence of scrutiny surrounding utilization controls. The scrutiny focused more on the management of care rather than direct funding for prevention.
C. Reduction in the number of healthcare providers
This is incorrect as the scrutiny did not necessarily lead to a reduction in the number of healthcare providers. Utilization controls were primarily aimed at managing the cost of care, not reducing provider numbers.
D. Expansion of fee-for-service models
This is incorrect. The scrutiny surrounding utilization controls actually highlighted the limitations of fee-for-service models, leading to an interest in alternative models such as capitation or value-based care that focus more on outcomes and efficiency rather than volume of services.
What is a significant barrier to nurses' engagement in policy change?
-
Lack of time, resources, and support.
-
Overwhelming support from healthcare organizations.
-
Excessive funding for policy training.
-
Abundant public relations skills among nurses.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A. Lack of time, resources, and support.
Explanation
A significant barrier to nurses' engagement in policy change is the lack of time, resources, and support. Nurses often have demanding clinical responsibilities, and without proper time allocation or organizational backing, it can be difficult for them to participate in policy change initiatives. Adequate resources and institutional support are essential to allow nurses to engage in meaningful policy development and advocacy.
Why other options are wrong
B. Overwhelming support from healthcare organizations
While support from healthcare organizations is crucial, it is not a barrier. The lack of support or insufficient engagement from organizations is a barrier, not overwhelming support. Nurses need organizational backing to participate effectively in policy change.
C. Excessive funding for policy training
Excessive funding for policy training is not typically a barrier. In fact, additional funding for training programs can help nurses become more involved in policy discussions. The issue is usually a lack of funding or opportunities for education in policy matters, rather than an excess of it.
D. Abundant public relations skills among nurses
While public relations skills may be helpful for nurses in advocating for policy changes, the abundance of such skills is not a barrier. The true barrier lies in practical issues like time, resources, and institutional support, rather than nurses’ abilities to engage in public relations.
During the past several years, US health care spending has
-
leveled off
-
fallen as a percent of the GDP
-
has been surpassed only by escalating housing costs
-
has grown more rapidly than any other sector of the economy
Explanation
Correct Answer
D. has grown more rapidly than any other sector of the economy
Explanation
Over the past several years, U.S. healthcare spending has continued to increase at a faster rate than other sectors of the economy. The growth in healthcare spending has been driven by factors such as an aging population, increased prevalence of chronic conditions, advances in medical technology, and rising healthcare prices. This trend has outpaced the growth of many other economic sectors.
Why other options are wrong
A. leveled off
This is incorrect. Healthcare spending has not leveled off in recent years; it has continued to increase at a higher rate than other sectors.
B. fallen as a percent of the GDP
This is incorrect. Healthcare spending has not fallen as a percentage of GDP. In fact, it has continued to increase and now represents a significant portion of the U.S. GDP.
C. has been surpassed only by escalating housing costs
This is incorrect. While housing costs have increased, healthcare spending has still grown more rapidly than housing costs, making it one of the fastest-growing sectors in the U.S. economy.
Which of the following best describes the fundamental difference between viewing healthcare as a commodity versus a right?
-
Healthcare as a commodity prioritizes market efficiency, while healthcare as a right emphasizes equitable access for all individuals.
-
Healthcare as a commodity focuses on universal coverage, while healthcare as a right limits access based on income.
-
Healthcare as a commodity advocates for government control, while healthcare as a right supports privatization.
-
Healthcare as a commodity is based on social justice principles, while healthcare as a right is driven by profit motives.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A. Healthcare as a commodity prioritizes market efficiency, while healthcare as a right emphasizes equitable access for all individuals.
Explanation
Viewing healthcare as a commodity places emphasis on market principles, where healthcare is treated as a product subject to supply and demand, and market efficiency is prioritized. On the other hand, viewing healthcare as a right stresses the importance of ensuring equitable access to healthcare for all individuals, regardless of their ability to pay.
Why other options are wrong
B. Healthcare as a commodity focuses on universal coverage, while healthcare as a right limits access based on income.
This is incorrect because healthcare as a commodity does not necessarily focus on universal coverage. It is more focused on efficiency and market-based mechanisms, whereas healthcare as a right aims to provide equal access to all individuals, irrespective of their income.
C. Healthcare as a commodity advocates for government control, while healthcare as a right supports privatization.
This is inaccurate because healthcare as a commodity often supports privatization and market-driven approaches, whereas healthcare as a right tends to advocate for more government intervention or oversight to ensure that all individuals can access care.
D. Healthcare as a commodity is based on social justice principles, while healthcare as a right is driven by profit motives.
This statement is reversed. Healthcare as a commodity is typically driven by profit motives and market principles, while healthcare as a right aligns more with social justice principles, emphasizing access for all.
What is the main source of funding for private healthcare organizations?
-
Through volunteer work and charity events.
-
Through patient payments and insurance reimbursements.
-
Through government grants and public funding.
-
Through donations and community fundraising.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B. Through patient payments and insurance reimbursements.
Explanation
Private healthcare organizations primarily rely on payments from patients and reimbursements from insurance companies to fund their operations. This model allows them to generate the revenue needed to provide medical services, maintain facilities, and pay healthcare providers. Unlike public healthcare organizations, private organizations typically do not rely on government funding or charity work as their primary source of income.
Why other options are wrong
A. Through volunteer work and charity events.
While volunteer work and charity events may contribute to private healthcare organizations in a secondary role, they are not the primary source of funding. These activities do not generate the consistent revenue needed to support the organization's operations and services at the scale required. Private healthcare relies heavily on patient payments and insurance rather than donations or volunteer work.
C. Through government grants and public funding.
Private healthcare organizations do not rely on government grants or public funding, which are typically available to public healthcare institutions. Private organizations are independent and are funded through payments directly from patients or their insurance companies, not from taxpayers' money or governmental support.
D. Through donations and community fundraising.
Although some private healthcare organizations may receive donations or engage in community fundraising efforts, this is not the primary method of funding. Donations and fundraising events are supplementary and do not provide the stable, ongoing financial support needed for day-to-day operations.
What is a primary advantage of Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) for employers?
-
Lower overall healthcare costs due to fixed premiums
-
Greater flexibility in choosing healthcare providers
-
Higher reimbursement rates for services rendered
-
Increased administrative burden on the employer
Explanation
Correct Answer
A. Lower overall healthcare costs due to fixed premiums
Explanation
One of the primary advantages of Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) for employers is that they often have fixed premiums, which help control and lower overall healthcare costs. This is because HMOs focus on preventative care and managing costs through a network of providers, which helps employers predict their healthcare expenses more accurately.
Why other options are wrong
B. Greater flexibility in choosing healthcare providers
HMOs are typically more restrictive in terms of provider choice. Employees in HMOs must choose from a network of approved providers, limiting their flexibility compared to other healthcare plans like PPOs (Preferred Provider Organizations).
C. Higher reimbursement rates for services rendered
HMOs generally do not offer higher reimbursement rates. Instead, they provide a fixed rate for services, focusing on managing costs rather than increasing reimbursements.
D. Increased administrative burden on the employer
HMOs are designed to streamline administrative processes by having a managed network of providers. This reduces the administrative burden for employers, as the HMO handles much of the coordination and billing. Therefore, this option is incorrect as an advantage for employers.
How to Order
Select Your Exam
Click on your desired exam to open its dedicated page with resources like practice questions, flashcards, and study guides.Choose what to focus on, Your selected exam is saved for quick access Once you log in.
Subscribe
Hit the Subscribe button on the platform. With your subscription, you will enjoy unlimited access to all practice questions and resources for a full 1-month period. After the month has elapsed, you can choose to resubscribe to continue benefiting from our comprehensive exam preparation tools and resources.
Pay and unlock the practice Questions
Once your payment is processed, you’ll immediately unlock access to all practice questions tailored to your selected exam for 1 month .