Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223)
Access The Exact Questions for Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223)
💯 100% Pass Rate guaranteed
🗓️ Unlock for 1 Month
Rated 4.8/5 from over 1000+ reviews
- Unlimited Exact Practice Test Questions
- Trusted By 200 Million Students and Professors
What’s Included:
- Unlock 0 + Actual Exam Questions and Answers for Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223) on monthly basis
- Well-structured questions covering all topics, accompanied by organized images.
- Learn from mistakes with detailed answer explanations.
- Easy To understand explanations for all students.
Your All-Access Prep Bundle: Unlocked Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223) : Practice Questions & Answers
Free Healthcare Policy and Economics (D223) Questions
Who is responsible for enforcing HIPAA regulations?
-
National Institutes of Health
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
-
Department of Health and Human Services for Civil Rights
-
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Explanation
Correct Answer
C. Department of Health and Human Services for Civil Rights
Explanation
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for Civil Rights is responsible for enforcing HIPAA regulations. HHS ensures that healthcare organizations and other covered entities comply with HIPAA rules related to the privacy and security of patient health information. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) within HHS is specifically tasked with investigating complaints and enforcing penalties for non-compliance.
Why other options are wrong
A. National Institutes of Health
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is a government agency focused on biomedical research and does not enforce HIPAA regulations. While NIH may play a role in healthcare research, the enforcement of privacy and security laws like HIPAA falls under HHS.
B. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is primarily concerned with public health and disease prevention, not the enforcement of HIPAA regulations. While the CDC works with healthcare data, it does not enforce privacy laws related to patient health information.
D. Federal Bureau of Investigation
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) may get involved in criminal investigations related to HIPAA violations if they involve criminal intent, but it is not the agency responsible for the day-to-day enforcement of HIPAA regulations. That responsibility lies with the Department of Health and Human Services for Civil Rights.
Which principle emphasizes the importance of treating patients with respect and empathy at PeaceHealth?
-
Compassionate Care
-
Community Outreach
-
Technological Advancement
-
Financial Efficiency
Explanation
Correct Answer
A. Compassionate Care
Explanation
Compassionate care is the principle that emphasizes treating patients with respect, empathy, and understanding. This principle ensures that patients feel valued and cared for, which is essential for their overall well-being and experience at PeaceHealth. It involves more than just providing medical treatment; it focuses on fostering emotional support and addressing the human aspects of patient care.
Why other options are wrong
B. Community Outreach
Community outreach focuses on engaging with the community and providing health education, resources, and services to those in need. While it is an important principle, it is not specifically about treating patients with respect and empathy in the direct care setting, as compassionate care is.
C. Technological Advancement
Technological advancement refers to the use of new technologies to improve healthcare services, but it does not directly address the emotional and respectful treatment of patients. While technology plays a significant role in modern healthcare, compassionate care is focused on the human aspects of patient treatment.
D. Financial Efficiency
Financial efficiency involves managing resources and costs effectively to ensure the hospital operates sustainably. While important for the overall operation, it does not prioritize treating patients with respect and empathy, which is the focus of compassionate care.
What was a significant personal experience Isabella Taylor had at PeaceHealth Southwest?
-
She had a family member treated there.
-
She volunteered there during her studies.
-
She was born there and gave birth to her children there.
-
She worked there as a doctor.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C. She was born there and gave birth to her children there.
Explanation
Isabella Taylor’s significant personal experience at PeaceHealth Southwest was deeply connected to her own life events—she was born there and later gave birth to her children at the same hospital. This connection creates a meaningful bond with the hospital and highlights its role in her family's life. This type of experience is unique and personal compared to other potential connections like volunteering or working there.
Why other options are wrong
A. She had a family member treated there.
While having a family member treated at a hospital can be a significant experience, it does not necessarily create the same level of deep personal connection as being born and giving birth there. This option lacks the direct, lifelong tie that makes the correct answer more meaningful.
B. She volunteered there during her studies.
Volunteering is a valuable experience, but it is not as personally significant as being born in a hospital and later having children there. Volunteering is typically a temporary engagement rather than a lifelong connection.
D. She worked there as a doctor.
Working as a doctor is a professional experience rather than a personal one. While it may be meaningful, it does not compare to the deeply personal nature of birth and childbirth, which establish a generational connection to the hospital.
What was a significant consequence of the exclusion of fringe benefits from taxable income during the establishment of employer-based healthcare?
-
It incentivized employers to offer more health benefits to attract workers
-
It led to a decrease in overall healthcare spending
-
It resulted in higher taxes for employees
-
It caused a shift towards individual health insurance plans
Explanation
Correct Answer
A. It incentivized employers to offer more health benefits to attract workers
Explanation
The exclusion of fringe benefits, including health insurance, from taxable income created a tax advantage for employers who offered health benefits to their employees. This tax benefit made it financially advantageous for employers to provide health insurance, which in turn led to an increase in employer-based healthcare offerings. Employers could attract and retain workers by providing health benefits without having to pay additional taxes.
Why other options are wrong
B. It led to a decrease in overall healthcare spending
This is incorrect because employer-based healthcare, in fact, did not decrease overall healthcare spending. It often led to more widespread access to healthcare, but it did not directly reduce the costs of healthcare. In many cases, healthcare spending increased due to higher insurance premiums.
C. It resulted in higher taxes for employees
This is not true. The exclusion of fringe benefits from taxable income actually reduced the taxable income of employees who received employer-provided health benefits, potentially lowering their overall tax burden.
D. It caused a shift towards individual health insurance plans
This is incorrect. The exclusion of fringe benefits led to an increase in employer-based health insurance, not individual health insurance. It made employer-sponsored insurance more attractive and widespread, making individual health insurance plans less common for many workers.
Which of the following best describes the financial structure of an indemnity health insurance plan?
-
The insurance company directly pays the patient for all healthcare costs incurred.
-
The employer pays the insurance company a fixed premium regardless of claims.
-
The insurance company acts as an administrator, processing claims and passing costs onto the employer.
-
Patients are required to pay all healthcare costs upfront and seek reimbursement later.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D. Patients are required to pay all healthcare costs upfront and seek reimbursement later.
Explanation
Indemnity health insurance, also known as traditional or fee-for-service insurance, typically requires patients to pay for healthcare costs out of pocket at the time of service. Afterward, patients submit claims to the insurance company for reimbursement based on the terms of their policy. This system allows for more flexibility in choosing healthcare providers but also places the burden of payment on the patient initially.
Why other options are wrong
A. The insurance company directly pays the patient for all healthcare costs incurred.
This is incorrect because, in indemnity plans, the insurance company reimburses the patient after the patient has paid for the healthcare services, not directly paying the patient upfront.
B. The employer pays the insurance company a fixed premium regardless of claims.
This description aligns more with group health insurance plans where the employer pays a fixed premium, but it is not specific to indemnity plans, which are structured around reimbursement for services rendered rather than a fixed premium arrangement.
C. The insurance company acts as an administrator, processing claims and passing costs onto the employer.
This describes a self-insured employer plan where the employer takes on the financial risk of providing health insurance, not an indemnity plan. In indemnity plans, the insurance company assumes the financial responsibility for claims rather than simply acting as an administrator.
What is a potential negative impact of the law on minors?
-
It guarantees immediate treatment for all minors
-
It can cause a delay in medical treatment
-
It allows minors to make decisions independently
-
It prevents parents from being involved in care
Explanation
Correct Answer
B. It can cause a delay in medical treatment
Explanation
One potential negative impact of the law on minors is that it can cause a delay in medical treatment. The requirement to obtain parental consent before treatment can sometimes result in delays, particularly if the parent is unavailable or if the consent process takes time to complete. This delay could potentially worsen the minor's health condition or create unnecessary stress for both the child and the healthcare provider.
Why other options are wrong
A. It guarantees immediate treatment for all minors
This is incorrect because the law does not guarantee immediate treatment for minors. In most cases, consent must be obtained before treatment can proceed, which can lead to delays in care, as mentioned in the correct answer.
C. It allows minors to make decisions independently
This is incorrect because, in most jurisdictions, minors do not have the legal capacity to make medical decisions independently. The law requires that a parent or guardian provide consent, not the minor themselves, except in specific situations such as mature minor laws or emergency care.
D. It prevents parents from being involved in care
This is incorrect because the law actually ensures that parents are involved in the care of their minor children. In most cases, parental consent is a requirement, and parents are typically involved in decisions regarding their child's medical treatment.
What does the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) require before releasing patient information?
-
Authorization from a family member is sufficient
-
Written authorization from the patient
-
Verbal authorization from the patient
-
No authorization is needed
Explanation
Correct Answer
B. Written authorization from the patient
Explanation
The California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) requires written authorization from the patient before releasing any patient information. This law ensures that patient privacy is protected, and healthcare providers must obtain explicit, written consent from the patient for the release of their medical information to third parties, unless an exception applies under the law.
Why other options are wrong
A. Authorization from a family member is sufficient
This is incorrect because authorization from a family member alone is not sufficient. The law requires that the patient themselves give written authorization unless there is a legal exception that allows family members to give consent.
C. Verbal authorization from the patient
This is incorrect because verbal authorization is not sufficient under the CMIA. The law mandates written consent for the release of medical information to ensure there is a clear, documented record of the patient’s permission.
D. No authorization is needed
This is incorrect because the CMIA specifically requires authorization before releasing patient information. Exceptions to this rule exist, but in general, patient information cannot be disclosed without written authorization.
What are the potential consequences for violating CMIA compliance?
-
Only verbal warnings
-
Only civil penalties
-
No penalties at all
-
Civil and criminal penalties
Explanation
Correct Answer
D. Civil and criminal penalties
Explanation
Violating the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) can lead to both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties may involve fines, while criminal penalties can result in more severe consequences, including imprisonment, depending on the nature of the violation. These penalties serve to protect patient confidentiality in the healthcare system.
Why other options are wrong
A. Only verbal warnings
Violating CMIA does not result in only verbal warnings. Given the importance of maintaining patient confidentiality, violations can lead to serious legal and financial consequences, including fines and possible jail time, not just warnings.
B. Only civil penalties
While civil penalties are a possible consequence, CMIA violations can also lead to criminal penalties. The law includes provisions for both civil fines and criminal sanctions to ensure strict enforcement of patient confidentiality.
C. No penalties at all
This is incorrect. There are well-defined penalties for violations of CMIA, including both civil and criminal consequences. This ensures that healthcare organizations and providers are held accountable for protecting patient information.
Which of the following "outside firms" are hired to administer self-insured plans?
-
Secondary administrators
-
Reinsurers
-
Third party administrators
-
Secondary insurers
Explanation
Correct Answer
C. Third party administrators
Explanation
Third-party administrators (TPAs) are commonly hired by self-insured companies to manage the claims process, enrollment, and other administrative functions of self-insured health plans. These firms handle day-to-day operations on behalf of the self-insured entity, ensuring that claims are processed and paid correctly.
Why other options are wrong
A. Secondary administrators
Secondary administrators do not typically refer to firms that manage self-insured health plans. This term is not commonly used in the context of insurance administration.
B. Reinsurers
Reinsurers are companies that provide insurance to insurance companies, allowing them to manage risk. They do not administer self-insured plans, but rather provide financial protection against large losses.
D. Secondary insurers
Secondary insurers are not typically involved in the administration of self-insured plans. Secondary insurance refers to a policy that covers additional costs after the primary insurance has been paid, and they are not responsible for plan administration.
What happens if a provider treats a minor without obtaining consent?
-
They will receive a warning only
-
They may face a misdemeanor charge
-
They can continue treating without consequences
-
They will be fined but not charged
Explanation
Correct Answer
B. They may face a misdemeanor charge
Explanation
Treating a minor without obtaining proper consent can lead to legal consequences, including potential misdemeanor charges. Healthcare providers are required by law to obtain consent from a parent or legal guardian before treating a minor. Failure to do so could result in legal action, including criminal charges depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances.
Why other options are wrong
A. They will receive a warning only
A warning is not sufficient for treating a minor without consent, as this is a violation of legal requirements. Providers can face more severe consequences, such as legal charges, rather than just a warning.
C. They can continue treating without consequences
Treating a minor without consent carries legal risks, and providers cannot continue treatment without consequences. Failure to obtain proper consent may result in serious legal issues, including criminal charges.
D. They will be fined but not charged
While fines could be part of the penalty, the potential legal consequence for treating a minor without consent often includes criminal charges such as a misdemeanor. A fine alone does not address the seriousness of this violation.
How to Order
Select Your Exam
Click on your desired exam to open its dedicated page with resources like practice questions, flashcards, and study guides.Choose what to focus on, Your selected exam is saved for quick access Once you log in.
Subscribe
Hit the Subscribe button on the platform. With your subscription, you will enjoy unlimited access to all practice questions and resources for a full 1-month period. After the month has elapsed, you can choose to resubscribe to continue benefiting from our comprehensive exam preparation tools and resources.
Pay and unlock the practice Questions
Once your payment is processed, you’ll immediately unlock access to all practice questions tailored to your selected exam for 1 month .