Critical Thinking: Reason and Evidence D265
Access The Exact Questions for Critical Thinking: Reason and Evidence D265
💯 100% Pass Rate guaranteed
🗓️ Unlock for 1 Month
Rated 4.8/5 from over 1000+ reviews
- Unlimited Exact Practice Test Questions
- Trusted By 200 Million Students and Professors
What’s Included:
- Unlock 51 + Actual Exam Questions and Answers for Critical Thinking: Reason and Evidence D265 on monthly basis
- Well-structured questions covering all topics, accompanied by organized images.
- Learn from mistakes with detailed answer explanations.
- Easy To understand explanations for all students.
Need Practice Questions for Critical Thinking: Reason and Evidence D265 ? Try studying with 150 + questions shared by our website
Free Critical Thinking: Reason and Evidence D265 Questions
Why do strong Critical thinkers monitor their own biases
-
To demonstrate that they have fewer biases than their opponents
-
To minimize their biases
-
To understand how their biases influence their thinking
-
To eliminate their biases
Explanation
Correct Answers:
B. To minimize their biases
C. To understand how their biases influence their thinking
Explanation of Each Correct Option:
B. To minimize their biases
This is correct because strong critical thinkers aim to reduce the impact of personal bias on their reasoning. While bias can't be completely removed, being aware of it helps limit its influence.
C. To understand how their biases influence their thinking
This is correct because recognizing bias allows individuals to reflect on how it shapes their perceptions, judgments, and decisions, leading to more objective and fair-minded thinking.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. To demonstrate that they have fewer biases than their opponents
This is incorrect because critical thinking is about improving one’s own reasoning, not competing with others or proving superiority.
D. To eliminate their biases
This is incorrect because completely eliminating bias is unrealistic. Bias is a natural part of human cognition, but its influence can be managed through awareness and reflection.
Which statement represents a logical reaction to a source claiming to be free from bias
-
This can't be true because all sources contain falsehoods.
-
This may be true because bias and credibility are predicated upon personal experience.
-
This is most likely true because all sources are free of bias.
-
This can't be true because all sources contain bias.
Explanation
Correct Answer D: This can't be true because all sources contain bias.
Explanation:
D. This can't be true because all sources contain bias.
This is correct because no source is completely free from bias. Every source is influenced to some extent by its authors’ perspectives, language, context, or purpose. Recognizing this helps critical thinkers evaluate information more carefully and realistically.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. This can't be true because all sources contain falsehoods.
This is incorrect because not all sources contain falsehoods. While bias exists, it doesn't mean the information itself is false.
B. This may be true because bias and credibility are predicated upon personal experience.
This is incorrect because bias is not solely based on personal experience. Bias can come from institutional, cultural, or editorial influences, not just individual perspective.
C. This is most likely true because all sources are free of bias.
This is incorrect because it's factually untrue. No source is entirely unbiased; the claim that "all sources are free of bias" is itself illogical.
A university student surveys incoming freshmen to understand how students at the university feel about a proposed tuition increase.Which statements are true regarding this statistical sample
-
It is not representative.
-
It is not random.
-
It is representative.
-
It is random.
Explanation
Correct Answers:
A. It is not representative.
B. It is not random.
Explanation of Each Correct Option:
A. It is not representative.
This is correct because surveying only incoming freshmen does not reflect the views of the entire student body, which includes sophomores, juniors, seniors, and graduate students. The sample is skewed toward one specific group.
B. It is not random.
This is correct because selecting only incoming freshmen is a non-random selection. A random sample would include students of all years and types, selected without bias.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
C. It is representative.
This is incorrect because the sample excludes a large portion of the university’s student population. Therefore, it cannot accurately represent the entire group.
D. It is random.
This is incorrect because the sample is targeted (only incoming freshmen), not randomly chosen from the full student population.
All bears are wild. Smokey is a bear. Therefore, Smokey is wild.
Which term describes the argument
-
.Inductive
-
Abductive
-
Deductive
-
Invalid
Explanation
Correct Answer C: Deductive
Explanation:
C. Deductive
This is correct because the conclusion logically follows with certainty from the premises. The argument begins with a general rule (“All bears are wild”) and applies it to a specific case (“Smokey is a bear”) to reach a conclusion (“Smokey is wild”). This is the structure of a deductive argument.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Inductive
This is incorrect because inductive reasoning draws general conclusions from specific observations. This argument does the opposite—it applies a general rule to a specific case.
B. Abductive
This is incorrect because abductive reasoning involves inferring the most likely explanation for an observation. This argument doesn't infer an explanation; it deduces a conclusion based on given premises.
D. Invalid
This is incorrect because the argument is valid: if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. There is no flaw in the logic structure.
Which two characterizations are most accurate regarding the credibility of information sources
-
If a source makes a single claim that is not credible, the source should never be trusted again.
-
The credibility of sources spans a spectrum.
-
Sources may lack credibility for a variety of reasons.
-
Political sources are seldom credible.
Explanation
Correct Answers:
B: The credibility of sources spans a spectrum.
C: Sources may lack credibility for a variety of reasons.
Explanation of Each Correct Option:
B. The credibility of sources spans a spectrum.
This is correct because credibility is not all-or-nothing. A source may be highly reliable in one area but less so in another. Evaluating credibility requires considering factors like evidence, transparency, and consistency—not just a binary judgment.
C. Sources may lack credibility for a variety of reasons.
This is correct because sources can be unreliable due to bias, misinformation, lack of evidence, poor fact-checking, conflicts of interest, or unverified authorship. Understanding these different reasons helps in critically evaluating information.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. If a source makes a single claim that is not credible, the source should never be trusted again.
This is incorrect because a single error does not necessarily discredit an entire source, especially if it issues corrections and shows a pattern of overall reliability.
D. Political sources are seldom credible.
This is incorrect because while some political sources may exhibit bias, not all are inherently untrustworthy. Many political sources offer accurate and verifiable information. Each should be assessed individually.
Which fallacy of weak induction best describes the following example?"If we allow the children to stay home from school today, they will expect to stay home every time it snows. Next they will expect to stay home whenever it rains, when it is too cold, too hot, or even too nice outside. Eventually the children will stay home from school every day.
-
Slippery slope
-
Appeal to ignorance
-
Hasty generalization
-
Equivocation
Explanation
Correct Answer A: Slippery slope
Explanation:
A. Slippery slope
This is correct because the argument claims that a relatively small first step (letting children stay home once) will inevitably lead to a chain of related negative events (children staying home every day), without providing evidence that such an extreme progression is likely.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
B. Appeal to ignorance
This is incorrect because appeal to ignorance argues something is true or false based on lack of evidence, which is not the case here.
C. Hasty generalization
This is incorrect because hasty generalization involves making a broad conclusion from too little evidence, not a causal chain prediction.
D. Equivocation
This is incorrect because equivocation involves ambiguous use of a word or phrase, which is not present in this example.
"If magicians can pull rabbits out of hals, then magic is real. Magicians can pull rabbils out of hats. Therefore, I know that magic is real." Which two statements represent conjoint support when mapping this example to a body of propositions
-
Magicians can pull rabbits out of hats.
-
If magicians can pull rabbits out of hats, then magic is real.
-
.Either magic is real or magic is not real.
-
I know that magic is real.
Explanation
Correct Answers:
A. Magicians can pull rabbits out of hats.
B. If magicians can pull rabbits out of hats, then magic is real.
Explanation of Each Correct Option:
A. Magicians can pull rabbits out of hats.
This is correct because it is a premise providing direct evidence in support of the conclusion.
B. If magicians can pull rabbits out of hats, then magic is real.
This is correct because it is a conditional premise that, together with option A, supports the conclusion.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
C. Either magic is real or magic is not real.
This is incorrect because this is a tautology (a logical certainty) and does not contribute support to the conclusion.
D. I know that magic is real.
This is incorrect because this is the conclusion, not supporting evidence.
I have grown bored since last week.
Which descriptor accurately characterizes this sentence
-
Weak argument
-
Inference
-
Strong argument
-
Proposition
Explanation
Correct Answer D: Proposition
Explanation:
This is correct because the sentence is a declarative statement that expresses a condition or personal experience. It can be evaluated as either true or false, which qualifies it as a proposition.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Weak argument
This is incorrect because the sentence does not present reasoning or evidence meant to support a conclusion. It simply states a personal feeling.
B. Inference
This is incorrect because the sentence does not draw a conclusion from evidence. It offers no premises or reasoning—just a direct statement.
C. Strong argument
This is incorrect because there is no argument being made. A strong argument requires both premises and a conclusion, none of which are present here.
What are two ways in which the internet has complicated a critical thinking approach to finding reliable sources
-
Sources are more easily located yet not consistently credible.
-
Sources are more easily located and generally credible.
-
Sources are more easily located but none are credible.
-
Sources are more easily located but still need to be verified.
Explanation
Correct Answers:
A. Sources are more easily located yet not consistently credible.
D: Sources are more easily located but still need to be verified.
Explanation of Each Correct Option:
A. Sources are more easily located yet not consistently credible.
This is correct because the internet makes it simple to find information quickly, but the credibility of that information varies widely. Some sources are reliable, while others spread misinformation or present biased views without evidence.
D. Sources are more easily located but still need to be verified.
This is also correct because even though information is more accessible, critical thinkers must still evaluate and verify the accuracy and credibility of what they find before trusting or using it.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
B. Sources are more easily located and generally credible.
This is incorrect because while many sources exist, not all are credible. Credibility must be assessed individually.
C. Sources are more easily located but none are credible.
This is incorrect because it is too extreme. Many credible sources exist online, especially those from reputable institutions or experts, but they must be carefully selected.
Since inflation is rising rapidly, and because we are approaching the point at which reversal is not possible, it follows that we need to institute a new economic policy, and we need to act quickly.
Which two statements contain premises of the given argument
-
Inflation is rising rapidly.
-
We need to institute a new economic policy.
-
We are approaching the point at which reversal is not possible.
-
We need to act quickly.
Explanation
Correct Answers:
A. Inflation is rising rapidly.
C. We are approaching the point at which reversal is not possible.
Complete Statements (Premises):
A. Inflation is rising rapidly.
This is a complete premise. It provides a factual basis that supports the conclusion. It explains why action might be necessary.
C. We are approaching the point at which reversal is not possible.
This is a complete premise. It adds urgency to the situation and helps justify the need for a new policy and rapid action.
Incomplete Statements (Conclusions):
B. We need to institute a new economic policy.
This is an incomplete option as a premise. It is not a supporting fact but a conclusion drawn from the premises. It tells us what action is needed, not why.
D. We need to act quickly.
This is also incomplete as a premise. It represents part of the conclusion or recommendation, not a factual reason leading to the conclusion.
How to Order
Select Your Exam
Click on your desired exam to open its dedicated page with resources like practice questions, flashcards, and study guides.Choose what to focus on, Your selected exam is saved for quick access Once you log in.
Subscribe
Hit the Subscribe button on the platform. With your subscription, you will enjoy unlimited access to all practice questions and resources for a full 1-month period. After the month has elapsed, you can choose to resubscribe to continue benefiting from our comprehensive exam preparation tools and resources.
Pay and unlock the practice Questions
Once your payment is processed, you’ll immediately unlock access to all practice questions tailored to your selected exam for 1 month .
Frequently Asked Question
It’s a recurring monthly subscription. You can cancel anytime without penalties or hidden fees.
No. Our practice materials are available online only to ensure you always have the latest content and updates.
Critical thinking improves your decision-making, problem-solving, and communication skills in both personal and professional situations.
No prior experience or skills are necessary. The course is designed for beginners and gradually builds your reasoning and analytical skills.
Your subscription includes over 200 actual exam questions with detailed explanations to help you prepare for your final assessment with confidence.
Yes. Our platform is fully mobile-friendly, so you can study on your phone, tablet, or computer anytime, anywhere.
This course teaches students how to analyze arguments, evaluate evidence, recognize biases, and make well-reasoned decisions based on logic and facts.