Technology and Ethics: Emerging Trends and Society (D773)
Access The Exact Questions for Technology and Ethics: Emerging Trends and Society (D773)
💯 100% Pass Rate guaranteed
🗓️ Unlock for 1 Month
Rated 4.8/5 from over 1000+ reviews
- Unlimited Exact Practice Test Questions
- Trusted By 200 Million Students and Professors
What’s Included:
- Unlock Actual Exam Questions and Answers for Technology and Ethics: Emerging Trends and Society (D773) on monthly basis
- Well-structured questions covering all topics, accompanied by organized images.
- Learn from mistakes with detailed answer explanations.
- Easy To understand explanations for all students.
Access Every exact Technology and Ethics: Emerging Trends and Society (D773) Practice Question You Need to pass
Free Technology and Ethics: Emerging Trends and Society (D773) Questions
Which of the following statements best illustrates the concept of subjective relativism?
-
Moral truths are universal and apply to all individuals regardless of context
-
Cultural norms dictate what is considered right or wrong in different societies.
-
Each individual has the authority to determine their own moral beliefs and values
-
Ethical standards are established by legal systems and enforced by governments
Explanation
Explanation:
Subjective relativism holds that moral judgments depend entirely on an individual’s personal beliefs or preferences. According to this perspective, what is morally right or wrong varies from person to person, and no external authority or universal standard exists to override an individual’s view. The statement that each individual has the authority to determine their own moral beliefs and values captures this idea because it locates moral authority in personal perspective rather than societal consensus or objective standards.
Correct Answer:
Each individual has the authority to determine their own moral beliefs and values
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Moral truths are universal and apply to all individuals regardless of context
This reflects moral objectivism, which asserts that moral truths are independent of individual opinion.
Cultural norms dictate what is considered right or wrong in different societies
This describes cultural relativism, where morality is shaped by societal practices, not individual preference.
Ethical standards are established by legal systems and enforced by governments
This refers to legal positivism or a legalistic view of ethics, not subjective relativism, which focuses on personal moral autonomy.
Which ethical theory is often criticized for its reliance on outcomes that are beyond an individual's control, leading to the issue of moral luck?
-
Deontological Ethics
-
Virtue Ethics
-
Act Utilitarianism
-
Social Contract Theory
Explanation
Explanation:
Act Utilitarianism determines the morality of an action solely by its consequences, aiming to produce the greatest happiness or utility. Because consequences are often unpredictable and can be influenced by factors outside the agent’s control, critics argue that this approach makes moral judgment dependent on “moral luck.” An action performed with the best intentions could be deemed wrong if unforeseen outcomes are harmful, while a reckless action could be considered right if it accidentally produces good results. This dependence on results beyond the individual’s control is a key criticism of Act Utilitarianism.
Correct Answer:
Act Utilitarianism
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Deontological Ethics
Deontological theories, such as Kantian ethics, focus on the intention and adherence to duty rather than on the consequences, so they are not subject to the problem of moral luck in the same way.
Virtue Ethics
Virtue ethics evaluates moral character and the cultivation of virtues, emphasizing the agent’s disposition rather than external outcomes, so it does not primarily rely on uncontrollable results.
Social Contract Theory
Social Contract Theory centers on the agreements and rules established within society to maintain order and mutual benefit. It is concerned with the legitimacy of these agreements, not the unpredictable outcomes of individual actions.
Which of the following was NOT a focus of the People's Computer Company, a non-profit organization based in San Francisco?
-
Promoting computer literacy among the public
-
Creating affordable computing resources for schools
-
Developing the first personal computer operating system
-
Facilitating community workshops on programming
Explanation
Explanation:
The People’s Computer Company (PCC), active in the 1970s, aimed to make computing accessible to everyone by fostering computer literacy, offering workshops, and providing affordable computing resources to schools and communities. However, PCC did not develop the first personal computer operating system. Their mission was educational and community-driven rather than focused on pioneering commercial software or operating system development.
Correct Answer:
Developing the first personal computer operating system
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Promoting computer literacy among the public
PCC was deeply committed to helping the public learn about computers and understand how to use them effectively.
Creating affordable computing resources for schools
Providing low-cost access to computing technology for educational institutions was a key part of PCC’s community mission.
Facilitating community workshops on programming
Workshops and classes designed to teach programming skills were central to PCC’s efforts to democratize computer knowledge.
Which of the following best describes the distinction between perfect and imperfect duties in ethical theory?
-
Perfect duties are obligations that can be ignored in certain situations, while imperfect duties must always be fulfilled
-
Perfect duties are obligations that must be fulfilled without exception, while imperfect duties are obligations that should be fulfilled generally but allow for exceptions
-
Perfect duties are moral obligations that apply only to specific individuals, while imperfect duties apply universally to all
-
Perfect duties are duties that can be delegated to others, while imperfect duties cannot be assigned
Explanation
Explanation:
In ethical theory, especially within Immanuel Kant's deontological framework, perfect duties are those moral obligations that admit no exceptions and must be carried out in all circumstances. Examples include the duty not to lie or the duty to keep promises. Imperfect duties, on the other hand, are moral obligations that are important but allow for flexibility in how and when they are fulfilled. Duties like beneficence or helping others fall into this category; one is required to pursue these ends, but there is discretion regarding when, how, and to what extent to act. The second option captures this distinction accurately by emphasizing the strict, exceptionless nature of perfect duties and the generally binding yet flexible nature of imperfect duties.
Correct Answer:
Perfect duties are obligations that must be fulfilled without exception, while imperfect duties are obligations that should be fulfilled generally but allow for exceptions.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Perfect duties are obligations that can be ignored in certain situations, while imperfect duties must always be fulfilled.
This reverses the actual distinction. Perfect duties are the ones that cannot be ignored under any circumstance, whereas imperfect duties can be approached with flexibility. Claiming that perfect duties can be ignored misrepresents the core concept of an absolute duty in Kantian ethics.
Perfect duties are moral obligations that apply only to specific individuals, while imperfect duties apply universally to all.
Both perfect and imperfect duties are universal moral obligations according to Kant, meaning they apply to all rational beings. The distinction does not concern to whom the duty applies, but rather how strictly the duty must be followed. Therefore, this option mischaracterizes the universality of these duties.
Perfect duties are duties that can be delegated to others, while imperfect duties cannot be assigned.
Delegation is not a relevant factor in distinguishing perfect from imperfect duties. Whether or not someone else can carry out a task does not define the nature of the moral obligation. The key difference is the strictness of the duty and whether it allows for exceptions, not the possibility of delegation.
Rules-based Al systems are expert systems which use preprogrammed algorithms to make human-like decisions
-
true
-
false
Explanation
Explanation:
Rules-based AI systems, often called expert systems, operate using a set of preprogrammed rules or algorithms to mimic human decision-making in specific domains. They apply “if-then” logic to evaluate information and provide conclusions or recommendations much like a human expert would. Because they follow predetermined rules rather than learning autonomously, describing them as expert systems that use preprogrammed algorithms to make human-like decisions is accurate.
Correct Answer:
true
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
false
This is incorrect because rules-based AI indeed relies on preprogrammed rules to replicate aspects of human reasoning within a defined area. Denying this misrepresents how such systems function.
According to the Principle of Utility, which of the following statements best describes the evaluation of an action's moral worth?
-
An action is morally right if it is performed out of duty, regardless of the consequences.
-
An action is considered good if it produces more pleasure than pain for the greatest number of people.
-
An action is deemed wrong if it is performed without the consent of all parties involved
-
An action is ethical if it aligns with societal norms and traditions.
Explanation
Explanation:
The Principle of Utility, central to utilitarianism as developed by philosophers such as Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, evaluates the moral worth of an action by its ability to maximize happiness or pleasure and minimize pain. An action is morally right if it results in the greatest net benefit—more pleasure than pain—for the largest number of people affected. This focus on overall consequences and collective well-being defines utilitarian ethical reasoning.
Correct Answer:
An action is considered good if it produces more pleasure than pain for the greatest number of people
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
An action is morally right if it is performed out of duty, regardless of the consequences
This is a core principle of Kantian ethics, which values duty and intention over outcomes.
An action is deemed wrong if it is performed without the consent of all parties involved
While consent can be ethically significant, the Principle of Utility evaluates morality based on overall happiness, not solely on consent.
An action is ethical if it aligns with societal norms and traditions
This aligns with cultural relativism or conventionalism, not with the utilitarian calculation of pleasure and pain.
Which of the following statements accurately describes a significant contribution made by Tim Berners-Lee to the development of the World Wide Web?
-
He developed the first search engine for the internet
-
He created the first web browser and established the foundational protocols for the web
-
He invented the concept of packet-switching
-
He was the first to commercialize web browsing software
Explanation
Explanation:
Tim Berners-Lee is credited with inventing the World Wide Web in 1989–1990. He created the first web browser and web server and designed the fundamental protocols such as HTTP and HTML, which enabled the seamless sharing of information over the internet. His work provided the essential framework upon which the modern web is built.
Correct Answer:
He created the first web browser and established the foundational protocols for the web
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
He developed the first search engine for the internet
The first widely recognized search engines came later and were developed by others, not Berners-Lee.
He invented the concept of packet-switching
Packet-switching, critical to networking, was developed earlier by researchers like Paul Baran and Donald Davies.
He was the first to commercialize web browsing software
Berners-Lee focused on open standards and free access, not commercialization of web browsers.
What is a key argument in favor of subjective relativism regarding moral disagreements?
-
Moral truths are universal and objective.
-
Different cultures have distinct moral frameworks
-
Intelligent individuals can hold opposing views on ethical matters
-
Moral debates lead to clear and agreed-upon conclusions
Explanation
Explanation:
Subjective relativism asserts that moral judgments depend on individual perspectives rather than universal standards. A central argument in its favor is that equally rational, intelligent people often disagree about moral questions without either side being objectively wrong. This shows that morality can be personal and subjective, shaped by individual experiences and reasoning, rather than grounded in universally accepted truths.
Correct Answer:
Intelligent individuals can hold opposing views on ethical matters
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Moral truths are universal and objective
This reflects moral objectivism, which is the opposite of subjective relativism’s claim that morality depends on personal belief.
Different cultures have distinct moral frameworks
This supports cultural relativism, which focuses on society-wide norms rather than individual moral autonomy.
Moral debates lead to clear and agreed-upon conclusions
Subjective relativism recognizes that moral debates often remain unresolved because individuals can have irreconcilable personal views.
In the context of ethical communication practices, how might Ann's decision to send a mass email about the Girl Scout cookie sale be evaluated from a Utilitarian perspective?
-
Ann's action is justified as it benefits the majority who ordered cookies, outweighing the dissatisfaction of others
-
Ann's action is wrong because it disregards the preferences of the 40 unhappy recipients
-
Ann's action is ethically neutral since it did not cause any significant harm
-
Ann's action is acceptable as long as she included an option for recipients to opt-out of future emails.
Explanation
Explanation:
Utilitarianism evaluates actions based on their overall consequences, aiming to maximize happiness or utility for the greatest number of people. Ann’s mass email likely pleased those interested in ordering cookies or supporting the Girl Scouts, producing positive outcomes such as enjoyment and community support. Although some recipients were unhappy with receiving the email, the discontent of a relatively small group does not outweigh the broader benefits to the majority who appreciated the message and the good cause it promoted. From a utilitarian perspective, the action is ethically justified if the overall happiness and benefits generated exceed the annoyance or discomfort caused to a smaller group.
Correct Answer:
Ann's action is justified as it benefits the majority who ordered cookies, outweighing the dissatisfaction of others.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Ann's action is wrong because it disregards the preferences of the 40 unhappy recipients.
Utilitarianism focuses on the net balance of pleasure over pain for all affected parties. While the dissatisfaction of some recipients matters, it is not decisive if the action leads to greater overall happiness. This option adopts more of a deontological view focused on individual rights rather than the utilitarian calculation of total consequences.
Ann's action is ethically neutral since it did not cause any significant harm.
Utilitarianism rarely classifies actions as simply neutral when there are measurable positive and negative outcomes. The email generated both benefits and minor inconveniences, so the action cannot be accurately described as neutral; instead, it should be assessed by weighing those effects.
Ann's action is acceptable as long as she included an option for recipients to opt-out of future emails.
While offering an opt-out respects preferences and might reduce future harm, utilitarian ethics still judge the action primarily by its net happiness or unhappiness in the present situation. The absence or presence of an opt-out mechanism is secondary to the overall balance of positive versus negative consequences.
Which of the following statements best captures a key advantage of Rule Utilitarianism in moral decision-making?
-
It requires a detailed analysis of every possible outcome for each decision.
-
It provides a consistent framework that can be applied across various situations.
-
It allows for personal biases to influence moral judgments
-
It prioritizes individual preferences over societal norms
Explanation
Explanation:
Rule Utilitarianism focuses on establishing general moral rules that, when followed consistently, promote the greatest overall happiness. A key advantage of this approach is that it offers a stable and predictable framework for ethical decision-making. By relying on well-tested rules, it avoids the need to calculate outcomes for every individual act, ensuring consistency and fairness across different situations.
Correct Answer:
It provides a consistent framework that can be applied across various situations.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
It requires a detailed analysis of every possible outcome for each decision
This describes Act Utilitarianism, which evaluates each specific act rather than applying general rules.
It allows for personal biases to influence moral judgments
Rule Utilitarianism seeks to minimize subjective bias by applying universal principles aimed at overall happiness.
It prioritizes individual preferences over societal norms
The theory prioritizes the collective well-being through general rules, not individual preferences.
How to Order
Select Your Exam
Click on your desired exam to open its dedicated page with resources like practice questions, flashcards, and study guides.Choose what to focus on, Your selected exam is saved for quick access Once you log in.
Subscribe
Hit the Subscribe button on the platform. With your subscription, you will enjoy unlimited access to all practice questions and resources for a full 1-month period. After the month has elapsed, you can choose to resubscribe to continue benefiting from our comprehensive exam preparation tools and resources.
Pay and unlock the practice Questions
Once your payment is processed, you’ll immediately unlock access to all practice questions tailored to your selected exam for 1 month .
Frequently Asked Question
Master D773 focuses on the intersection of technology and ethics. It covers key topics like artificial intelligence (AI), data privacy, digital ethics, cybersecurity, and the societal impacts of emerging technologies.
ULOSCA offers over 200 real exam-style questions along with detailed explanations. The platform helps you understand complex topics by breaking them down into easy-to-understand step-by-step rationales.
The platform offers unlimited access for just $30 per month, making it an affordable option for exam preparation.
Yes, the study questions and explanations are specifically designed to align with the D773 course objectives, ensuring you're focused on the right material for your exam.
Absolutely! ULOSCA provides flexible learning, allowing you to study at your own pace, anywhere, and anytime.
Yes, ULOSCA includes real exam-style questions that simulate the actual exam environment, giving you a chance to practice under realistic conditions.
Yes, ULOSCA covers all major areas in the D773 course, including AI, data privacy, digital ethics, cybersecurity, and the societal impacts of emerging technologies.
ULOSCA offers support through forums and FAQs where you can get answers to your questions. Additionally, their resources are designed to clarify complex topics.
You can track your progress as you work through the practice questions and explanations. This helps you identify areas where you may need further study.
ULOSCA's study materials are specifically tailored to the D773 exam, offering realistic practice questions and clear, detailed rationales. It combines affordability with high-quality, focused content.