Wonderlic SLE For Nursing Schools
Wonderlic SLE
Boost your exam performance with Ulosca’s Wonderlic SLE Exam Review. This guide is designed for students preparing to excel on the Scholastic Level Exam (SLE) — a critical assessment of cognitive skills, problem-solving ability, and academic readiness. With targeted practice and expert strategies, you’ll master the key concepts needed to perform at your best.
Everything you need to answer with confidence:
- Covers all Wonderlic SLE exam topics, including general knowledge & quick recognition, logic & deductive reasoning, shape pattern analysis, English language skills (synonyms, antonyms, and sentence rearrangement), and quantitative problem-solving (decimals, ratios, averages, percentages, and algebraic number problems).
- Features practice sets with multiple-choice, scenario-based, and problem-solving questions modeled after the actual Wonderlic SLE exam format.
- Strengthens your ability to process information quickly, identify patterns, solve problems, and apply logical reasoning under strict time constraints.
- Fully aligned with the Wonderlic SLE content structure and scoring standards to maximize your testing performance.
- Unlimited access for just $30/month.
Join students who trust Ulosca to sharpen their reasoning skills, boost confidence, and pass the Wonderlic SLE exam — the first time.
Rated 4.8/5 from over 1000+ reviews
- Unlimited Exact Practice Test Questions
- Trusted By 200 Million Students and Professors
What’s Included:
- Unlock 300 + Actual Exam Questions and Answers for Wonderlic SLE For Nursing Schools on monthly basis
- Well-structured questions covering all topics, accompanied by organized images.
- Learn from mistakes with detailed answer explanations.
- Easy To understand explanations for all students.
Free Wonderlic SLE For Nursing Schools Questions
One word below appears in color. What is the OPPOSITE of that word?
The detective solved the case after overlooking the evidence carefully.
-
combining
-
arranging
-
drawing
-
interviewing
-
scrutinizing
Explanation
Correct Answer:
scrutinizing
Explanation
The word “overlooking” means failing to notice or ignoring something. Its opposite is “scrutinizing,” which means examining something very carefully and paying close attention to details. Since the sentence contrasts the act of missing evidence with the careful act of examining evidence, “scrutinizing” is the direct opposite.
Why Other Options Are Wrong
Combining is incorrect because it means putting things together, which has no direct relation to noticing or ignoring.
Arranging is incorrect because it refers to organizing, not the act of observing or missing details.
Drawing is incorrect because it relates to sketching or pulling something, not to observation.
Interviewing is incorrect because it involves questioning people, not examining or ignoring evidence.
LEGIBLE is to READ as ____ is to HEAR.
-
LISTEN
-
SAY
-
SOUND
-
LITERATE
-
AUDIBLE
Explanation
The Correct Answer is:
AUDIBLE
Explanation of the Correct Answer
Legible means able to be read. The parallel for hearing is audible, which means able to be heard. The analogy pairs an adjective describing perceivability with the corresponding sense action: legible → read, audible → hear. Therefore, AUDIBLE correctly mirrors the relationship.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
LISTEN
Listen is a verb meaning to pay attention with the ears, not an adjective meaning “able to be heard.” It does not parallel legible, which is an adjective.
SAY
Say is a verb meaning to speak. It relates to producing sound, not the ability of sound to be heard, so it breaks the structure.
SOUND
Sound is a noun (or verb) referring to noise itself, not a property meaning “hearable.” It doesn’t match legible’s adjectival role.
LITERATE
Literate means able to read and write, describing a person’s ability, not the readability of text. It doesn’t align with the pattern “property of stimulus → sense action.”
Company 1 and Company 2 combined to create a total of 24 new products in Quarter 4 of 2014. Company 1 created 3 times as many products as Company 2. Therefore, Company 2 created ______ new products in Quarter 4 of 2014.
-
4
-
6
-
12
-
18
-
21
Explanation
The Correct Answer is:
6
Explanation of the Correct Answer
Let the number of products created by Company 2 = x.
Since Company 1 made 3 times as many products, Company 1 = 3x.
Total products:
x + 3x = 4x
4x = 24
x = 24 ÷ 4
x = 6
So, Company 2 created 6 new products in Quarter 4 of 2014.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
4
If Company 2 made 4 products, Company 1 would make 12, totaling only 16, which is too low.
12
If Company 2 made 12, Company 1 would make 36, giving a total of 48, which is incorrect.
18
If Company 2 made 18, Company 1 would make 54, totaling 72, far above the given 24.
21
If Company 2 made 21, Company 1 would make 63, totaling 84, which does not match the problem.
How many of the five pairs listed below are exact duplicates?
Truman, H.W. Trumen, H.W.
Salif, O.L. Salif, O.J.
Grinberg, A.L. Grinberg, A.L.
Havanos, B.G. Havanos, B.G.
Lichtenstein, D.W. Lichtunstein, D.W.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Explanation
Correct Answer:
2
Explanation:
To solve, each pair must be compared letter-for-letter.
“Truman, H.W.” vs. “Trumen, H.W.” differs in spelling (a vs. e). Not a duplicate.
“Salif, O.L.” vs. “Salif, O.J.” differs in the middle initial (L vs. J). Not a duplicate.
“Grinberg, A.L.” vs. “Grinberg, A.L.” is identical. Duplicate.
“Havanos, B.G.” vs. “Havanos, B.G.” is identical. Duplicate.
“Lichtenstein, D.W.” vs. “Lichtunstein, D.W.” differs in spelling (e vs. u). Not a duplicate.
Thus, there are exactly 2 duplicates.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
1
This is wrong because there are two confirmed duplicates, not just one. Both “Grinberg, A.L.” and “Havanos, B.G.” match perfectly, so limiting it to one ignores the second duplicate.
3
This option is incorrect because only two duplicates are found, not three. Pairs 1, 2, and 5 all contain spelling or initial mismatches, making them non-duplicates. Counting three would falsely assume one of these pairs matches exactly.
4
This option fails because only two of the pairs are true duplicates. Neither “Truman vs. Trumen” nor “Salif vs. Salif (O.L. vs. O.J.)” nor “Lichtenstein vs. Lichtunstein” are identical. Suggesting four duplicates overcounts by two.
5
This is incorrect because not all five pairs are exact duplicates. Only two of the pairs (“Grinberg” and “Havanos”) match letter-for-letter. The other three contain spelling or initial differences. Claiming five ignores the clear mismatches.
SCRUPULOUS is the opposite of:
-
Rigorous
-
Punctual
-
Negligent
-
Meticulous
Explanation
The Correct Answer is:
C. Negligent
Scrupulous describes someone who is extremely careful, precise, and attentive to doing things correctly. Negligent, on the other hand, refers to being careless, inattentive, and failing to meet expected standards. Since their meanings are directly opposed, negligent is the correct antonym.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Rigorous
Rigorous means strict and thorough, which is closely related to being scrupulous, not the opposite.
B. Punctual
Punctual means being on time, which aligns with the careful and attentive nature of someone scrupulous, so this is not the opposite.
D. Meticulous
Meticulous means extremely careful and precise, which is similar in meaning to scrupulous rather than contradictory.
FAR is to DISTANCE as DEEP is to _____.
-
CLOSE
-
SHALLOW
-
DEPTH
-
TALL
-
LONG
Explanation
The Correct Answer is:
DEPTH
Explanation of the Correct Answer
FAR relates to the noun that measures it: DISTANCE. Similarly, DEEP relates to the noun that measures it: DEPTH. The analogy pairs an adjective with its corresponding measurement noun, so DEEP correctly maps to DEPTH just as FAR maps to DISTANCE.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
CLOSE
Close is an adjective that is roughly the opposite of far; it does not represent the measurement noun corresponding to deep. The pattern requires a measurement noun, not an opposite adjective.
SHALLOW
Shallow is the antonym of deep, not the noun form that measures it. The analogy needs a noun (like DISTANCE) corresponding to the adjective, which shallow is not.
TALL
Tall is an adjective describing height, not the measurement noun associated with deep. It breaks the adjective-to-noun measurement relationship established by FAR:DISTANCE.
LONG
Long is an adjective related to length, not the noun that measures deepness. It fails to mirror the structure of adjective to its measurement noun.
John's monthly salary is $7,000. If John deposits 0.75 of his paycheck into a savings account, how much money does he put in his savings account every month?
-
$4,240
-
$4,250
-
$5,250
-
$6,250
Explanation
The Correct Answer is: C. $5,250
To calculate how much John deposits, multiply his salary by 0.75:
$7,000 × 0.75 = $5,250.
Therefore, John deposits $5,250 into his savings account every month.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. $4,240
This is incorrect because it does not match the correct calculation. Multiplying $7,000 by 0.75 does not give $4,240.
B. $4,250
This is incorrect since depositing 75% of $7,000 equals $5,250, not $4,250.
D. $6,250
This is incorrect because $6,250 would represent depositing almost 90% of his paycheck, which doesn’t match the given percentage of 75%.
Rearrange all of the words inside the box to make the best sentence. Which word should come JUST BEFORE “door”?
you lock behind please door the
-
you
-
lock
-
behind
-
please
-
the
Explanation
Correct Answer: the
Explanation
The best sentence using all the words is: “Please lock the door behind you.” In this correct sentence, the word that comes immediately before “door” is “the,” forming the noun phrase “the door.”
Why Other Options Are Wrong
you is incorrect because “you” correctly comes at the end: “…behind you.”
lock is incorrect because it’s the verb following “Please,” not placed before “door.”
behind is incorrect because it follows “door” in the phrase “behind you.”
please is incorrect because it begins the polite request: “Please lock…” not before “door.”
What is the next number in the series?
1/21 1/29 1/37 1/45 1/53 ____
-
1/59
-
1/60
-
1/61
-
1/62
-
1/63
Explanation
The Correct Answer is: 1/61
Explanation of the Correct Answer
Look at the denominators: 21, 29, 37, 45, 53.
Each denominator increases by +8.
21 + 8 = 29
29 + 8 = 37
37 + 8 = 45
45 + 8 = 53
53 + 8 = 61
So, the next fraction is 1/61.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
1/59
59 is not part of the +8 sequence and breaks the pattern.
1/60
60 is off by one; the correct continuation is 61, not 60.
1/62
62 skips past the correct denominator of 61.
1/63
63 is too far; it does not follow the consistent +8 pattern.
A girl is 12 years old and her brother is twice her age. When the girl is 50 years old, how old will her brother be?
-
62
-
76
-
74
-
69
Explanation
Correct Answer:
62
Explanation:
The brother is currently 24 years old because he is twice the girl’s age (12 × 2 = 24). The age difference between them is 12 years and remains constant as they grow older. When the girl reaches 50 years old, we simply add the 12-year difference to her age: 50 + 12 = 62. Therefore, the brother will be 62 years old at that time.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
76 – This would mean the brother is 26 years older than the girl, which contradicts the original 12-year difference.
74 – This would create a 24-year difference, which does not match the initial relationship.
69 – This implies a 19-year age gap, which is inconsistent with the given details.
How to Order
Select Your Exam
Click on your desired exam to open its dedicated page with resources like practice questions, flashcards, and study guides.Choose what to focus on, Your selected exam is saved for quick access Once you log in.
Subscribe
Hit the Subscribe button on the platform. With your subscription, you will enjoy unlimited access to all practice questions and resources for a full 1-month period. After the month has elapsed, you can choose to resubscribe to continue benefiting from our comprehensive exam preparation tools and resources.
Pay and unlock the practice Questions
Once your payment is processed, you’ll immediately unlock access to all practice questions tailored to your selected exam for 1 month .
Wonderlic SLE: Comprehensive Study Notes
The Wonderlic Scholastic Level Exam (SLE) evaluates applicants’ general cognitive abilities and academic readiness for admission and placement into various programs. It measures the ability to process information quickly, solve problems, and demonstrate language proficiency under strict time constraints. The exam is offered in two formats:
-
SLE-Q (Quicktest): 30 questions in 8 minutes, unproctored, online screening.
-
SLE (Full Exam): 50 questions in 12 minutes, proctored, in-person administration.
Both versions cover identical content and assess skills necessary for academic success.
Exam Structure & Key Content Areas
General Knowledge & Quick Recognition
-
Fast recall of basic facts and quick comparisons.
-
Identifying duplicates, interpreting short statements, and recognizing patterns.
Logic & Deductive Reasoning
-
Evaluating statements to determine whether a conclusion is True, False, or Uncertain.
-
Applying reasoning to solve short logical scenarios.
Shapes and Patterns
-
Recognizing spatial relationships and identifying the next figure in a sequence.
-
Pattern completion and figure manipulation exercises.
English Knowledge
-
Antonyms: Identify words with opposite meanings.
-
Synonyms: Choose words with similar meanings.
-
Rearranging Sentences: Correctly order words to form meaningful sentences.
Word Problems & Quantitative Skills
-
Decimals: Operations with decimals in real-world problems.
-
Ratios: Solving proportional relationships.
-
Calculating Averages: Working with mean values in data sets.
-
Percentages: Applying percentage formulas to solve practical scenarios.
-
Algebraic Number Problems: Translating word problems into equations and solving step-by-step.
Scoring & Timing
-
Each question is equally weighted.
-
SLE-Q: 30 questions → 8 minutes.
-
SLE: 50 questions → 12 minutes.
-
There is no penalty for incorrect answers.